[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12633102#action_12633102
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1387:
-------------------------------------
bq. I'm struggling to get two of the existing tests to pass... I don't think it
is from my modifications since they don't pass on the original either.
On my box the test fails with different results due to the writer not beeing
comitted in setUp, giving me 0 results. After adding a commit it fails with the
results you are reporting here.
Is it possible that you are getting one sort of result in the original due to
non committed writer and another error in this version due to your changes to
the distance measurement? All points in the list are rather close to each other
so very small changes to the algorithm might be the problem.
I have a hard time tracing the code and I'm sort of hoping this might be the
problem.
> Add LocalLucene
> ---------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1387
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1387
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: contrib/*
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: spatial.zip
>
>
> Local Lucene (Geo-search) has been donated to the Lucene project, per
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-77. This issue is to handle
> the Lucene portion of integration.
> See http://lucene.markmail.org/message/orzro22sqdj3wows?q=LocalLucene
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
