On Mar 18, 2009, at 13:01, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
I think we should move TrieRange* into core before 2.9? It's received alot of attention, from both developers (Uwe & Yonik did lots of iterations, and Solr is folding it in) and user interest. It's a simpler & more scalable way to index numeric fields that you intend to sort and/or do range querying on; we can do away with tricky number padding. Plus it's just plain cool :) I also think we should change its name. I know and love "trie", but it's a very technical term that's not immediately meaningful to users of Lucene's API. Plus I've learned from doing too many renamings lately that it's best to try to get the name right at the start. Maybe just NumberUtils, IntRangeFilter, LongRangeFilter, AbstractNumberRangeFilter?
+1 How about NumericRangeFilter ? Andi..
Thoughts? Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
