> Earwin, > I did not experiment lately, but I'd like to add a general compressed > integer array to the basic types in an index, that would be compressed > on writing and decompressed on reading. > A first attempt is at LUCENE-1410, and one of the choices I had there > was whether or not to use NIO buffer methods on the index side. > I started there using these NIO buffer methods, but it seems that > the explicit byte arrays you're using here could be a good alternative. > I think my question boils down to whether or not these NIO buffers will > (in the end) get in the way of similar low level optimizations > you'd like to see applied here. > Regards, > > Paul Elschot In my case I have to switch to MMap/Buffers, Java behaves ugly with 8Gb heaps. I'm thinking of trying to use Short/Int/LongBuffers that wrap my initial ByteBuffer.
-- Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (ear...@gmail.com) Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423 ICQ: 104465785 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
