On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Earwin Burrfoot<ear...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> But: I do not understand the problems with this JAR file. If somebody really >>> wants to have smaller files, one could use some tools, that do it >>> automatically on class usage. >> I personally have a couple of usecases for that as I have to work in >> very limited environments. Imagine embedded systems or mobile phones >> where 500 kb is a lot. if you realy need the analyzer you can include >> the additional jar. > Jar Jar Links - special tools for special tasks. > Well, you could do that by hand too, no question. unzip -> zip -> done. But this is not about "is it possible to do it?!" its about providing a packaging that is convinient for users. I would vote for an extra jar file as it is only packaging.
simon > -- > Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (ear...@gmail.com) > Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423 > ICQ: 104465785 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
