[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1726:
-------------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-1726.trunk.test.patch
I tried the test on trunk and get the same error. They're all
docstore related files so maybe extra doc stores are being
opened?
{code}
[junit] MockRAMDirectory: cannot close: there are still open files:
{_s4.fdt=2, _g2.fdx=2, _s4.fdx=2, _g2.tvf=2, _dw.fdx=2, _g2.tvd=2, _g2.tvx=2,
_ks.tvf=2, _n9.tvx=2, _ks.tvx=2, _n9.fdx=2, _ks.fdx=2, _dw.cfx=1, _n9.tvf=2,
_cp.cfx=1, _s4.tvf=2, _dw.tvx=2, _87.fdx=2, _fr.tvx=2, _87.tvf=2, _fr.tvd=2,
_87.fdt=2, _ks.tvd=2, _s4.tvd=2, _dw.tvd=2, _n9.fdt=2, _g2.fdt=2, _87.tvd=2,
_fr.fdt=2, _dw.fdt=2, _dj.cfx=1, _s4.tvx=2, _ks.fdt=2, _n9.tvd=2, _fr.tvf=2,
_fr.fdx=2, _dw.tvf=2, _87.tvx=2}
[junit] java.lang.RuntimeException: MockRAMDirectory: cannot close: there
are still open files: {_s4.fdt=2, _g2.fdx=2, _s4.fdx=2, _g2.tvf=2, _dw.fdx=2,
_g2.tvd=2, _g2.tvx=2, _ks.tvf=2, _n9.tvx=2, _ks.tvx=2, _n9.fdx=2, _ks.fdx=2,
_dw.cfx=1, _n9.tvf=2, _cp.cfx=1, _s4.tvf=2, _dw.tvx=2, _87.fdx=2, _fr.tvx=2,
_87.tvf=2, _fr.tvd=2, _87.fdt=2, _ks.tvd=2, _s4.tvd=2, _dw.tvd=2, _n9.fdt=2,
_g2.fdt=2, _87.tvd=2, _fr.fdt=2, _dw.fdt=2, _dj.cfx=1, _s4.tvx=2, _ks.fdt=2,
_n9.tvd=2, _fr.tvf=2, _fr.fdx=2, _dw.tvf=2, _87.tvx=2}
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.store.MockRAMDirectory.close(MockRAMDirectory.java:278)
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.index.Test1726.testIndexing(Test1726.java:48)
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.runTest(LuceneTestCase.java:88)
{code}
> IndexWriter.readerPool create new segmentReader outside of sync block
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1726
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1726
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1726.patch, LUCENE-1726.patch, LUCENE-1726.patch,
> LUCENE-1726.patch, LUCENE-1726.trunk.test.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 48h
> Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> I think we will want to do something like what field cache does
> with CreationPlaceholder for IndexWriter.readerPool. Otherwise
> we have the (I think somewhat problematic) issue of all other
> readerPool.get* methods waiting for an SR to warm.
> It would be good to implement this for 2.9.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
