[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12752271#action_12752271
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1896:
-------------------------------------

Hmm .. so perhaps the idea that they query scores are more comparable comes 
from:

if we take it out, that means the score will be the cosine X the euclidean 
distance - the distance will be rather large for a small query vector and a 
large doc vector (in magnitude). So a query that matched many large docs would 
could scale a lot harder than a query that hit small docs?

I guess that makes sense - scores not being very comparable anyway though, it 
hardly seems worth the extra compute cost ...

> Modify confusing javadoc for queryNorm
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1896
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Javadocs
>            Reporter: Jiri Kuhn
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> See http://markmail.org/message/arai6silfiktwcer
> The javadoc confuses me as well.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to