[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12752530#action_12752530
 ] 

Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1896:
-----------------------------------------

I know the queryNorm was based on some long ago research on it, but I don't 
know that it has proven to be all that useful.  There are certainly others who 
have done work on this, too.  In the end, I don't think the current 
implementation is all that useful and we could likely save a few ops by 
removing it, or giving people more powerful ways of changing it.

The bottom line, I think, is you shouldn't compare scores across queries.  
Often times, you can't even compare scores for the same query if the underlying 
index changed.  I also don't understand Marvin's comment about "completeness in 
the implementation of cosine similarity" nor the comment about scores being 
"closer together than farther apart".

> Modify confusing javadoc for queryNorm
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1896
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Javadocs
>            Reporter: Jiri Kuhn
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> See http://markmail.org/message/arai6silfiktwcer
> The javadoc confuses me as well.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to