[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12757215#action_12757215
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1919:
--------------------------------------
bq. This was introduced at the end of LUCENE-1057 without patch in JIRA. So it
must have something to do with this. Maybe Yonik can explain.
Urg... 2 years ago.
I think it was because Token.clone() didn't clone the payload, so next() would
do it to create a fully private copy.
Is it stil applicable? So many changes, I don't know.
> Analysis back compat break
> --------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1919
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1919
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1919.patch, LUCENE-1919.patch, LUCENE-1919.patch,
> LUCENE-1919.patch, LUCENE-1919.patch, LUCENE-1919.patch
>
>
> Old and new style token streams don't mix well.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
