[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12757201#action_12757201
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1919:
---------------------------------------
Thanks Robert, I added your test and did some more tests with the round robin
stream. We can now be sure, that it is fully private, not even the attributes
are touched :-) -> but I see no real sense in this requirement :-) People
should never use old and the brand new API in one consumer. Mixing old and
very-old is ok and was obviously used.
I will commit shortly.
Just one question: Does anybody know, why there is this extra payload cloning?
> Analysis back compat break
> --------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1919
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1919
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1919.patch, LUCENE-1919.patch, LUCENE-1919.patch,
> LUCENE-1919.patch, LUCENE-1919.patch, LUCENE-1919.patch
>
>
> Old and new style token streams don't mix well.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
