dude, will we have 2.9.2? :) simon
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > We should fix this; I'll open an issue & dig. > > Somehow SegmentInfo.files() is being buggy, claiming _0.prx is a file > belonging to the segment, when it clearly isn't. > > BTW we can't hold 2.9.1, since it's now "out" (as of yesterday) :) > > Mike > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi >> >> I wanted to check something and wrote this very simple program, which >> surprisingly failed because of a FileNotFound exception: >> >> Directory dir = new RAMDirectory(); >> IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(dir, new SimpleAnalyzer(), >> MaxFieldLength.UNLIMITED); >> writer.setInfoStream(System.out); >> writer.addDocument(new Document()); >> writer.commit(); >> writer.close(); >> >> It fails with the exception: >> >> Exception in thread "main" java.io.FileNotFoundException: _0.prx >> at >> org.apache.lucene.store.RAMDirectory.fileLength(RAMDirectory.java:149) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.segmentSize(DocumentsWriter.java:1150) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.flush(DocumentsWriter.java:587) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlushInternal(IndexWriter.java:3572) >> at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlush(IndexWriter.java:3483) >> at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.flush(IndexWriter.java:3474) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:1940) >> at >> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:1894) >> >> This happens on the latest code from trunk (and validated also against 2.4). >> Seems like it's there forever. This only happens when I set infoStream, >> because as part of the logging we compute the segment size. _0.prx is not >> found because I didn't add any terms to the index. If I don't set the >> infoStream, or add terms to the index, this exception is not thrown. >> >> Like I wrote in the subject, I don't think it's that important (for example >> to hold off 2.9.1), but still a bug. Not a very important bug even, but I >> can't get it out of my head that it's still a bug :) >> >> Can be fixed by making sure segmentSize() does not thrown any FNF exception >> for missing .prx? Does not sound too safe to me. Maybe we just remember this >> and tell people (like me) "even in silly tests, add a term to the document"? >> >> Shai. >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
