Oh ... I missed 2.9.1? sigh Thanks Mike
Shai On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > I sure hope not :) I hope 3.0 is out soonish... > > But just in case, I've reopened & marked fix version 2.9.2, so if we > ever do a 2.9.2 that'll remind me to backport. > > Mike > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Simon Willnauer > <simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > dude, will we have 2.9.2? :) > > > > simon > > > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Michael McCandless > > <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> We should fix this; I'll open an issue & dig. > >> > >> Somehow SegmentInfo.files() is being buggy, claiming _0.prx is a file > >> belonging to the segment, when it clearly isn't. > >> > >> BTW we can't hold 2.9.1, since it's now "out" (as of yesterday) :) > >> > >> Mike > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> I wanted to check something and wrote this very simple program, which > >>> surprisingly failed because of a FileNotFound exception: > >>> > >>> Directory dir = new RAMDirectory(); > >>> IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(dir, new SimpleAnalyzer(), > >>> MaxFieldLength.UNLIMITED); > >>> writer.setInfoStream(System.out); > >>> writer.addDocument(new Document()); > >>> writer.commit(); > >>> writer.close(); > >>> > >>> It fails with the exception: > >>> > >>> Exception in thread "main" java.io.FileNotFoundException: _0.prx > >>> at > >>> org.apache.lucene.store.RAMDirectory.fileLength(RAMDirectory.java:149) > >>> at > >>> > org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.segmentSize(DocumentsWriter.java:1150) > >>> at > >>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.flush(DocumentsWriter.java:587) > >>> at > >>> > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlushInternal(IndexWriter.java:3572) > >>> at > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlush(IndexWriter.java:3483) > >>> at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.flush(IndexWriter.java:3474) > >>> at > >>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:1940) > >>> at > >>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:1894) > >>> > >>> This happens on the latest code from trunk (and validated also against > 2.4). > >>> Seems like it's there forever. This only happens when I set infoStream, > >>> because as part of the logging we compute the segment size. _0.prx is > not > >>> found because I didn't add any terms to the index. If I don't set the > >>> infoStream, or add terms to the index, this exception is not thrown. > >>> > >>> Like I wrote in the subject, I don't think it's that important (for > example > >>> to hold off 2.9.1), but still a bug. Not a very important bug even, but > I > >>> can't get it out of my head that it's still a bug :) > >>> > >>> Can be fixed by making sure segmentSize() does not thrown any FNF > exception > >>> for missing .prx? Does not sound too safe to me. Maybe we just remember > this > >>> and tell people (like me) "even in silly tests, add a term to the > document"? > >>> > >>> Shai. > >>> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
