[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776878#action_12776878
]
Johan Kindgren commented on LUCENE-1260:
----------------------------------------
Haven't really thought about the back-compat question yet, but that's of course
an important aspect. When is the 3.0 release planned? I noticed that there were
a couple of issues still open, and that release will already break the
compatibility...
Maybe this kind of change should be tested for a couple of weeks before
bringing it to a release, if the 3.0 is impending.
Would you like me to continue working with this, or do you already have
suggestions for new names of the instance methods?
> Norm codec strategy in Similarity
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1260
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 2.3.1
> Reporter: Karl Wettin
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: Lucene-1260-1.patch, Lucene-1260.patch, LUCENE-1260.txt,
> LUCENE-1260.txt, LUCENE-1260.txt
>
>
> The static span and resolution of the 8 bit norms codec might not fit with
> all applications.
> My use case requires that 100f-250f is discretized in 60 bags instead of the
> default.. 10?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
