[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12778487#action_12778487 ]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2068: ----------------------------------------- bq. I just think we should use a consistent scheme (does not matter to me which way) I agree, we should rather not use the static import - its more expressive if it is explicit! I will upload another patch. > fix reverseStringFilter for unicode 4.0 > --------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2068 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2068 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: contrib/analyzers > Reporter: Robert Muir > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.1 > > Attachments: LUCENE-2068.patch, LUCENE_2068.patch, LUCENE_2068.patch > > > ReverseStringFilter is not aware of supplementary characters: when it > reverses it will create unpaired surrogates, which will be replaced by U+FFFD > by the indexer (but not at query time). > The wrong words will conflate to each other, and the right words won't match, > basically the whole thing falls apart. > This patch implements in-place reverse with the algorithm from apache harmony > AbstractStringBuilder.reverse0() -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org