On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > I suppose we could put up the artifacts on a dev site and then we could vote > to release both of them pretty quickly. I think that should be easy to do, > since it pretty much only involves verifying the jar and the signatures. Yep - that might be the best solution as it does not change code though. Whoever volunteers to do so has to checkout the same revision to make sure it is the same code while I doubt that we had changes in fast-vector-highlighter in the branch. -- Doh! no change in 3.0 branch but in 2.9.
simon > > On Dec 5, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > >> hi folks, >> The maven artifacts for fast-vector-highlighter have never been pushed >> since it was released because there were no pom.xml.template inside >> the module. I added a pom file a day ago in the context of >> LUCENE-2107. I already talked to uwe and grant how to deal with this >> issues and if we should push the artifact for Lucene 2.9 / 3.0. Since >> this is only a metadata file we could consider rebuilding the >> artefacts and publish them for those releases. I can not remember that >> anything like that happened before, so we should discuss how to deal >> with this situation and if we should wait until 3.1. >> >> simon >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
