What about tagging and branching? When we cut a Lucene release we also
tag Solr, even though it's not being released?
Michael
On 3/16/10 3:47 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
But it's actually the reverse? Solr depends on Lucene but not vice/versa.
(If instead I proposed making Solr a subdir of Lucene then I'd agree....)
So... if you checkout only lucene, you can cd there and do all you do
today with Lucene ("ant test", "ant dist", "svn diff", etc.).
If you checkout solr, you can cd there and "ant test" will run all of
Lucene's and all of Solr's tests. "svn diff" will include any changes
to lucene and to solr.
Ie this achieves want we want -- Solr to depend on Lucene but not vice
versa, right?
Mike
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Shai Erera<ser...@gmail.com> wrote:
I have to agree w/ Jake that putting Lucene under Solr gives the impression
as if suddenly Lucene became dependent on it ... and for really no good
reasons. Are we making that decision to simplify the build of Solr? What are
the problems Solr faces today w.r.t. its build and using a Lucene release or
trunk revision?
I didn't follow the Lucene/Solr merge on general@, because I didn't even
know such a beast exists. So I guess I'm missing something ...
Shai
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Jake Mannix<jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Yonik Seeley<yo...@apache.org> wrote:
Chiming in just a bit here - isn't there any concern that independent
of
whether or not people "can"
build lucene without checking out solr, the mere fact that Lucene will
be
effectively a "subdirectory"
of solr... is there no concern that there will then be a perception
that Lucene is a subproject of
Solr, instead of vice-versa?
Who would have this perception?
Casual users will be using downloads.
Developers and dev managers at companies doing build vs. buy decisions
regarding
whether they will do one of the following:
1) pay big bucks to get FAST or whatever
2) use Solr (free/cheap!)
3) pay [variable] bucks to build their own with Lucene
4) pay [variable but high] to build their own from scratch
I'm not concerned with casual downloaders. I'm talking about the
companies and people who
may or may not be interested in making multi-million dollar decisions
regarding using or
not using Lucene or Solr.
-jake
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
