On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Michael McCandless > <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >> >> If we move lucene under Solr's existing svn path, ie: >> >> /solr/trunk/lucene > > Chiming in just a bit here - isn't there any concern that independent of > whether or not people "can" > build lucene without checking out solr, the mere fact that Lucene will be > effectively a "subdirectory" > of solr... is there no concern that there will then be a perception that > Lucene is a subproject of > Solr, instead of vice-versa?
Who would have this perception? Casual users will be using downloads. Likewise, should solr be concerned that it's currently under a lucene URL? How many casual users actually understand the difference between the lucene TLP and the lucene java subproject? This is really about what makes most sense for development. -Yonik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
