You can implement just the "out of order" collector, since it subsumes the in-order case, and all will work fine.
However, if the collector can save CPU when docs are known to arrive in-order (not all collectors can) it'd be good to make a separate in-order one as well. Mike On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm still slightly confused on "in order" and "out of order" collectors. I > mean, I get what they do, but, if I'm implementing a new collector (see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2215) that is going to be part > of core, should I implement two versions: one for in order and one for out > of order? > > -Grant > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
