[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855265#action_12855265
 ] 

Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
------------------------------------

bq. Maybe change testImmediateDiskFull to set max allowed size to max(1, 
current-usage)?

Good idea ! Did it and it works.

Now ... one thing I haven't mentioned is the bw break. This is a behavioral bw 
break, which specifically I'm not so sure we should care about, because I 
wonder how many apps out there rely on being able to open a reader before they 
ever commited on a fresh new index. So what do you think - do this change 
anyway, OR ... utilize Version to our aid? I.e., if the Version that was passed 
to IWC is before LUCENE_31, we keep the initial commit, otherwise we don't do 
it? Pros is that I won't need to change many of the tests because they still 
use the LUCENE_30 version (but that is not a strong argument), so it's a weak 
Pro. Cons is that IW will keep having that doCommit handling in its ctor, only 
now w/ added comments on why this is being kept around etc.

What do you think?

> IndexWriter commits unnecessarily on fresh Directory
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2386
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Shai Erera
>            Assignee: Shai Erera
>             Fix For: 3.1
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2386.patch
>
>
> I've noticed IndexWriter's ctor commits a first commit (empty one) if a fresh 
> Directory is passed, w/ OpenMode.CREATE or CREATE_OR_APPEND. This seems 
> unnecessarily, and kind of brings back an autoCommit mode, in a strange way 
> ... why do we need that commit? Do we really expect people to open an 
> IndexReader on an empty Directory which they just passed to an IW w/ 
> create=true? If they want, they can simply call commit() right away on the IW 
> they created.
> I ran into this when writing a test which committed N times, then compared 
> the number of commits (via IndexReader.listCommits) and was surprised to see 
> N+1 commits.
> Tried to change doCommit to false in IW ctor, but it got IndexFileDeleter 
> jumping on me .. so the change might not be that simple. But I think it's 
> manageable, so I'll try to attack it (and IFD specifically !) back :).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to