Why not use Emacs/JDE/DDD?
Jesper Nordenberg wrote:
> I would recommend that you try Netbeans instead of Forte cause it's updated
> more often. It's a very good IDE, but I cant stand the debugger. Way to
> complicated to use and shows a lot of irrelevant information (static final
> fields for example). Of course the editor is not the same class as Emacs.
>
> It seems like every time I try an IDE I still return to Emacs cause I get
> things done much more quickly there. The only thing missing in Emacs/JDE is
> a good debugger, but you can always run JSwat or Bugseeker besides your
> Emacs session.
>
> > I've been doing my Java development using emacs (actually xemacs) but am
> > considering switching over to Forte (nee netbeans).
> >
> > Before I take the plunge in a non-trivial way, I'd like to hear other
> > people's opinions about Forte, both in terms of its design and
> > stability. (Early versions were unstable and/or unusably slow, but the
> > current version, 1.0 build 849, seems ok, at least so far.)
> >
> > Obviously, Forte is a very different animal than emacs, and has some
> > attractive features. particularly re building gui's. On the other hand,
> > emacs is reliable, stable, etc.
>
> --
> | Jesper Nordenberg, M.Sc. in C.S.E., [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | NNL Technology AB, www.nnl.se
> | Phone: +46 13 211400 Mobile: +46 70 9689374
> | Address: Teknikringen 1B, S-58330 Linköping, SWEDEN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
