It'd be interesting to see a current version of GCJ in those
comparisons. GCJ 2.95.2 is listed in the shudo.net page,
but that's _extremely_ old ... I'd suggest using the 2.96 that
is distributed with RedHat 7.0, as the most current "stable"
version available. (GCC 3.0 will have a more up-to-date
version, although still without serious optimizations. But
that codebase is still slushing, in prep for a release.)
- Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: SHUDO Kazuyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 5:46 AM
Subject: Re: Tya vs. shuJIT
> Volker wrote:
>
> > does anyone know which JIT is faster - Tya or shuJIT?
>
> http://www.shudo.net/jit/perf/
>
> This page shows results of performance comparisons of
> Java runtimes. Applied benchmarks are SPEC JVM98,
> SciMark 2.0, Linpack benchmark and Eratosthenes sieve.
>
> Andreas wrote:
>
> > http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/urz/java/news/00021.html
>
> The results shown in this page are quite old.
>
> Kazuyuki SHUDO Happy Hacking!
> Muraoka Lab., Grad. School of Sci. & Eng., Waseda Univ.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
