David Brownell wrote:
> It'd be interesting to see a current version of GCJ in those
> comparisons. GCJ 2.95.2 is listed in the shudo.net page,
> but that's _extremely_ old ... I'd suggest using the 2.96 that
> is distributed with RedHat 7.0, as the most current "stable"
> version available.
The newest stable version of GCC is still 2.95.2.
Please see http://www.assurdo.com/dd.sh/web-server/
This page says, GCC 2.96 is not a formal GCC release.
GCJ has been changed from 2.95.2 very much.
But, as you said, the current codebase seems to be unstable.
I don't wonder even if it cannot be compiled.
I'm also very interested in evaluating newer GCJ, but
I don't want to be bothered with such problems.
If there is a binary package (i.e. RPM) of a snapshot,
I'd like to measure its performance.
> (GCC 3.0 will have a more up-to-date
> version, although still without serious optimizations. But
> that codebase is still slushing, in prep for a release.)
Kazuyuki SHUDO Happy Hacking!
Muraoka Laboratory, Waseda University
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
