Is this a viable solution? Doesn't this make sorting and filtering much more complex and much more expensive as well?
Tony Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Wednesday 17 August 2005 22:49, Paul Elschot wrote: >> > the index could potentially be huge. >> > >> > So if this is indeed the case, it is a potential scalability >> > bottleneck in lucene index size. >> >> Splitting the date field into century, year in century, month, day, hour, >> seconds, and >> milliseconds will reduce the total number of indexed terms to 2300 or so. > > 1300 is closer, I forgot that I had split off the centuries. > > Regards, > Paul Elschot > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
