On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 6:08 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have the same situation and use an atomic counter. Basically, we have > a SearcherHolder class and a SearcherManager class. The SearcherHolder > holds the searcher and the number of threads referencing the searcher. > > When the thread that writes to the index closes the index, it sends an > event that the SearcherManager is listening for. The next time a search > is performed the manager opens a new searcher. The old searcher is marked > as outdated but is not closed until the last thread that references the > searcher returns it.
That sounds interesting. Couldn't it be part of the core capabilities of Lucene? Stéphane -- Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one, you suck" -- S.Yegge --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
