Hi Dana, There is no "out of the box" for Lucene, really, especially not when it comes to Analyzers. For example, look at this post and then the comments: http://blogs.sun.com/searchguy/entry/minion_and_lucene_case_sensitivity
Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: DanaWhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Sunday, May 4, 2008 7:28:57 PM > Subject: Re: Lucene's Mean Average Precision > > > I arrived at this MAP by modifying IndexFiles to use a StopAnalyzer and work > in a way that was acceptable for TReC files. The SearchFiles was modified > to use a StopAnalyzer and output data in a trec_eval suitable format. > Trec_eval reports about 11% at this setting. > > I am not competing in TReC I am just doing an evaluation of different search > engines. > > At this point I am not going to add anything to Lucene to get a higher MAP > because I am trying to get a feel for its "out of the box" performance. > > Dana > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Lucene%27s-Mean-Average-Precision-tp17049412p17052549.html > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
