Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> No, you create the filter via TermDocs/TermEnum. You can also cache
> them. Creating filters is *much* faster than you think <G>.
>
But I can have many terms in the query. With over 10 million documents and
many concurrent searches, creating a filter for every search would create a
lot of garbage, use a lot of ram and surely cripple the performance.
Also, I use the boolean AND and OR type functionality when filtering out
results.
And logically, it does not need to be done. I am just looking for the
standard way that people use fields to narrow done results. Every product
catalogue / shopping site does it.
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> Alternatively, you could boost everything *else* by some large factor
> and then the unimportant fields would add relatively little to the final
> score.
>
Thanks for the suggestions. Is there truly no non-hack way to accomplish
this?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Mixing-non-scored-an-scored-queries-tp18460018p18466151.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
