Well, the point of my question was to insure that we were all using common terms. For all we know, the original questioner considered "duplicate" records ones that had identical, or even similar text. Nothing in the original question indicated any de-dup happening.
I've often found that assumptions that we are all talking about the same thing are...er...incorrect. And I don't want to waste my time answering questions that weren't what was asked...... Best Erick On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:44 PM, markharw00d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>could you define duplicate? > > That's your choice of field that you want to de-dup on. > That could be a field such as "DatabasePrimaryKey" or perhaps a field > containing an MD5 hash of document content. > The DuplicateFilter ensures only one document can exist in results for each > unique value for the choice of field. > > Cheers > Mark > > Erick Erickson wrote: > >> could you define duplicate? As far as I know, you don't >> get the same (internal) doc id back more than once, so what >> is a duplicate? >> >> Best >> Erick >> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Sebastin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> at the time search , while querying the data >>> markrmiller wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Sebastin wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> Is there any possibility to avoid duplicate records in lucene 2.3.1? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I don't believe that there is a very high performance way to do this. >>>> You are basically going to have to query the index for an id before >>>> adding a new doc. The best way I can think of off the top of my head is >>>> to batch - first check that ids in the batch are unique, then check all >>>> ids in the batch against the IndexReader, then add the ones that are not >>>> dupes. Of course all of your docs would have to be added through this >>>> single choke point so that you knew other threads had not added that id >>>> after the first thread had looked but before it added the doc. >>>> >>>> I think Mark H has you covered if getting the dupes out after are okay. >>>> >>>> - Mark >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> >>> http://www.nabble.com/How-to-avoid-duplicate-records-in-lucene-tp18543588p18568862.html >>> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.526 / Virus Database: 270.5.3/1563 - Release >> Date: 20/07/2008 12:59 >> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
