Yeah, unfortunately, they are two distinct things, completely unrelated in terms of storage, access, etc. I've often felt the access to position/offset information is hard in Lucene, which makes it harder to do things like highlighting, co-occurrence analysis, etc.

LUCENE-1001 (which Mark Miller has revived a bit after I lost time on it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1001) is one step towards remedying this. By using Span Queries and (a working version) of that patch, one should be able to get at payload info related to the matches. Still not perfect, but better.

Purely wondering out loud here, but it may be possible to use the TermVectorMapper in conjunction with TermPositions to correlate the too, but I am not sure. The tricky part is you somehow need to optimize access to the TermPositions.

Another thought is to add payloads storage to TermVectors. Now we have offsets and positions, it's conceivable to also store payloads in a doc. centric way. The tradeoff being more storage space required. Still, if it's what you need, then it's what you need.

-Grant

On Aug 8, 2008, at 10:39 PM, Tricia Williams wrote:

Hi,

Following the history of Payloads from its beginnings (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-755 , https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-761, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-834 , http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/Payload_Planning) it looks like TermPostionsVector was never considered as part of the Payload functionality. I think this is based on the underlying index file structure??? I don't see any way to get at a Payload other than through a TermPositions object. I don't think there is a way to translate code which uses TermPositions to using TermPositionVector with regards to payloads -- but I welcome someone to show me how they could.

It looks like this conversation has happened at least twice before: http://www.nabble.com/Best-Practices-for-getting-Strings-from-a-position-range-td11608273.html#a11609245 and http://www.nabble.com/Best-way-to-get-payloads-td17399361.html#a17399361 . Unfortunately it doesn't look like anything came of it.

Maybe there is some other work around. What are you trying to accomplish "historically" with TermPositionsVectors instead of TermPositions?

Tricia

Martin Owens wrote:
Dear Lucene Users and Tricia Williams,

The way we're operating our lucene index is one where we index all the terms but not store the text. From your SOLR-380 patch example Tricia I was able to get a very good idea of how to set things up. Historically I have used TermPositionsVector instead of TermPositions because of that
data is available without storing the text in the index.

Is it possible to translate code which uses TermPositions to using
TermPositionsVector with regards to payloads?

Best Regards, Martin Owens

On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 11:14 -0600, Tricia Williams wrote:

Hi Martin,

Take a look at what I've done with SOLR-380 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-380 ). It might solve your problem, or at least give you a good starting point.

Tricia

Michael McCandless wrote:

I think you could use payloads (= arbitrary/opaque byte[]) for this?

You can attach a payload to each term occurrence during tokenization (indexing), and then retrieve the payload during searching.

Mike

Martin Owens wrote:


Hello Users,

I'm working on a project which attempts to store data that comes from an OCR process which describes the pixel co-ordinates of each term in the
document. It's used for hit highlighting.

What I would like to do is store this co-ordinate information alongside the terms. I know there is existing meta data stored per term (Word Offset and Char Offsets) the problem is that If I create a separate index and try and use the word offset or char offsets not only is it slower but it doesn't match because of the way the terms are processed
both inside of lucene and the OCR program.

So, is it possible to store the data alongside the terms in lucene and then recall them when doing certain searches? and how much custom code
needs to be written to do it?

Best Regards, Martin Owens

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com

Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ








---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to