On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yonik Seeley wrote: >> >> I wasn't originally going to add a Field.Index at all for omitNorms, >> but Doug suggested it. >> The problem with this type-safe way of doing things is the >> combinatorial explosion. > > Yeah I realize that. Now that we have omitTF as an option we could really > go crazy ;) > > I figured since we already have NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS we may as well round > it out with ANALYZED_NO_NORMS, and then stop there. Plus, people have been > surprised that you could do ANALYZED_NO_NORMS, yet it is useful.
Why not make this flag field into a bitmap? Cheers, Anthony --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
