Yes. And I think I have used this "trick" a couple of years ago, but have since forgotten about it. :)
Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 1:39:21 PM > Subject: Re: Case Sensitivity > > Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > So in other words, it *is* possible to have the field both tokenized and > > its > norms omitted? > > Yes. Probably this is an unintended side-effect of adding setOmitNorms, > but I think it's useful and IMHO we should keep it. > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrzej Bialecki <>< > ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ > [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web > ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration > http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]