We are doing lotsa internal changes for performance. Also upgrading the api to support for features. So my suggestion is to wait for 2.0. (should release this this month, at the latest mid jan) We can take this offline if you want to have a deeper discussion on browse engine.
Thanks -John On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Karsten F. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > hi glen, > > possible you will find this thread interesting: > > http://groups.google.com/group/xtf-user/browse_thread/thread/beb62f5ff9a16a3a/16044d1009511cda > was about a taxonomy like in your example. > Also take a look to the faceted browsing on date in > > http://www.marktwainproject.org/xtf/search?category=letters;style=mtp;facet-written= > > In solr 1.3 the faceted browsing was implemented with filter for each > possible value. > The implementation in xtf is quite more sophisticated ( > http://xtf.wiki.sourceforge.net/programming_Faceted_Browsing ). > I am not familiar with current version of solr. > > Best regards > Karsten > > > > hossman wrote: > > > > the simple faceting support provided out of the box by solr can easily be > > used for taxonomy based faceting if you encode your taxonomy breadcrumbs > > in the docs (a google search for "solr hierarchical facets" will give you > > lots off discussion on this). > > > > > > -Hoss > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Taxonomy-in-Lucene-tp20929487p20952134.html > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
