John can you describe some of these changes? They sound cool!
Mike
John Wang wrote:
We are doing lotsa internal changes for performance. Also upgrading
the api
to support for features. So my suggestion is to wait for 2.0. (should
release this this month, at the latest mid jan) We can take this
offline if
you want to have a deeper discussion on browse engine.
Thanks
-John
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Karsten F.
<[email protected]>wrote:
hi glen,
possible you will find this thread interesting:
http://groups.google.com/group/xtf-user/browse_thread/thread/beb62f5ff9a16a3a/16044d1009511cda
was about a taxonomy like in your example.
Also take a look to the faceted browsing on date in
http://www.marktwainproject.org/xtf/search?category=letters;style=mtp;facet-written=
In solr 1.3 the faceted browsing was implemented with filter for each
possible value.
The implementation in xtf is quite more sophisticated (
http://xtf.wiki.sourceforge.net/programming_Faceted_Browsing ).
I am not familiar with current version of solr.
Best regards
Karsten
hossman wrote:
the simple faceting support provided out of the box by solr can
easily be
used for taxonomy based faceting if you encode your taxonomy
breadcrumbs
in the docs (a google search for "solr hierarchical facets" will
give you
lots off discussion on this).
-Hoss
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Taxonomy-in-Lucene-tp20929487p20952134.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
