Absolutely!  I have received considerable help from the community and there
are so many more stuff I want to ask!

Cheers!

Amin

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

>
> Well, it's not yet committed.
>
> You can use it now by pulling the patch attached to the issue & testing it
> yourself.  If you do so, please report back!  This is how Lucene improves.
>
> I'm hoping we can include it in 2.9...
>
> Mike
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2009, at 6:35 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
>  Sweet!  When will this highlighter be available?  Can I use this now?
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Michael McCandless <
>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>>>
>>> I think that would be good.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'll open an issue.
>>>
>>> Probably a silly thing to ask but I guess there is a performance
>>>
>>>> implication by setting it to max value.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Right.  And it's tough choosing a default in situations like this --
>>> performance vs losing stuff.
>>>
>>> However, there's a new highlighter:
>>>
>>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1522
>>>
>>> which looks like it may have promising performance and no default "loses
>>> highlighted terms" limit, I think.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to