On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:57 PM, eks dev<eks...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > it works with current trunk, 10 Minutes ago built?!
Hmmm, OK, maybe it was the DISI bug. Do we have any Scorers in Lucene that forgot to implement advance() and hence got the slow default version??? Not sure how to ask the IDE for that info... -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com > > if I put lucene from yesterday, the same symptoms like yesterday... > > Mike's instrumented version is running ... > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com> >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org >> Sent: Wednesday, 15 July, 2009 23:34:29 >> Subject: Re: speed of BooleanQueries on 2.9 >> >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Uwe Schindlerwrote: >> > And the fix only affects custom DocIdSetIterators. >> >> And custom Queries (via Scorer) since Scorer inherits from DISI. >> But as Mike says, it shouldn't be the issue behind in this thread. >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
