warmduscher :) good night
----- Original Message ---- > From: Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, 16 July, 2009 1:06:30 > Subject: RE: speed of BooleanQueries on 2.9 > > Same here, too late! Good night! > And the blood glucose level is very low, too - very bad for such problems... > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com] > > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 12:59 AM > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: speed of BooleanQueries on 2.9 > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:52 PM, eks devwrote: > > > > > Also not really expected, but this query runs over BS2, shouldn't +( > > whatewer whatever1...) run as BS? what does it mean to have MUST +() at > > the top level? > > > > Your query is +(((X Y Z))^2). In BQ.rewrite, any single-clause query > > that hasn't had minNRShouldMatch set will return its single sub-query, > > rewritten. So your query should (recursively) rewrite to a simple > > BooleanQuery (ie just OR'd terms), which is eligible for BS. > > > > And we see BS in your hung stack trace ;) > > > > > it is a bit late here, I am going to bed ... > > > > Good night! > > > > Mike > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
