Hello Shashi,

Could you please provide me your DB related information. How big the db size,  
memory etc. 

I am currently having 100 million records splitted in 10 indexes in the same 
system. I am using ParallelSearcher and search speed is also good. 

Regards
Ganesh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shashi Kant" <shashi....@gmail.com>
To: <java-user@lucene.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: How to improve search time?


> Prashant, I have had better luck with even larger sized indices on
> similar platforms. Could you elaborate what types of queries you are
> running, Multifield? Boolean? combinations? etc. Also you might want
> to remove unnecessary stored fields from the index and move them to a
> relational db to squeeze out better performance.
> 
> 
> Shashi
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:18 AM, prashant
> ullegaddi<prashullega...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I did that as well. Actually, we had 32 indexes initially. We searched them.
>> It was even horrible.
>> After that I merged them into 4 indexes. And did the same. No gain!
>>
>> Then, I had to merge 32 indexes into one.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Anshum <ansh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Prashant,
>>> 8 seconds as the minimum time is a little too much, though considering
>>> you're using just 4G of RAM its still ok.
>>> I would advice you to break your index into smaller indexes, perhaps
>>> selectively query the indexes (if that's possible for your application) and
>>> use a parallelmultisearcher. Its just something that you might try and
>>> like.
>>> All said and done, parallelizing would only get you a bell-curve like
>>> performance graph, so you'd have to figure out the sweet spot there.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>> Naukri Labs!
>>> http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
>>>
>>> The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
>>> distinction is yours to draw............
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:08 AM, prashant ullegaddi <
>>> prashullega...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'm running it on Quadcore, 2.4GHz each, 4GB RAM.
>>> >
>>> > Prashant.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
>>> > otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com
>>> > > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > With such a large index be prepared to put it on a server with lots of
>>> > RAM
>>> > > (even if you follow all the tips from the Wiki).
>>> > > When reporting performance numbers, you really ought to tell us about
>>> > your
>>> > > hardware, types of queries, etc.
>>> > >
>>> > > Otis
>>> > > --
>>> > > Sematext is hiring -- http://sematext.com/about/jobs.html?mls
>>> > > Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ----- Original Message ----
>>> > > > From: prashant ullegaddi <prashullega...@gmail.com>
>>> > > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > > Sent: Monday, August 3, 2009 12:33:46 AM
>>> > > > Subject: How to improve search time?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Hi,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I've a single index of size 87GB containing around 50M documents.
>>> When
>>> > I
>>> > > > search for any query,
>>> > > > best search time I observed was 8sec. And when query is expanded with
>>> > > > synonyms, search takes
>>> > > > minutes (~ 2-3min). Is there a better way to search so that overall
>>> > > search
>>> > > > time reduces?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > Prashant.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to