: Hi : I include a testcase to show what I am trying to do. Testcase number 3 : fails.
the mailing list is finicky about attachments ... the best thing to do is to include your test case directly in the body of your email as plain text. : > I created a test case to test this solution and it works. The problem is : > that if UWB searches for "HELLO" that exists in another field such as: : > data:HELLO then he should get a result. It's only when the query is matched : > on reference he should not see anything. My testcase fails when the match : > is made on the data field as the security filter does not pass (valid : > filter). Is there a way around this? Hope this made sense! it sounds like perhaps you just need to group your clauses... data:HELLO (uw-reference:HELLO +uw-uwb:HELLO) ...if HELLO is in data, you'll get a match regardless of the other fields. if it's not in data, but it is in uw-reference, it will only match if it's also in uw-uwb. -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
