Just to be safe, I ran with the official jar file from one of the mirrors
and reproduced the problem.
The debug session is not showing any characters = '\uffff' (checking this in
Tokenizer).
The output from the modified CheckIndex follows. There are only a few terms
with the inconsistency. They are all legitimate terms from the app's
context. With this info, I might be able to isolate the source documents.
What should I be looking for when they are indexed?
CheckInput output:
Opening index @ D:\mnsavs\lresumes1\lresumes1.luc\lresumes1.search.main.4
Segments file=segments_2 numSegments=3 version=FORMAT_DIAGNOSTICS [Lucene
2.9]
1 of 3: name=_0 docCount=413585
compound=false
hasProx=true
numFiles=8
size (MB)=1,148.817
diagnostics = {os.version=5.2, os=Windows 2003, lucene.version=2.9.0
817268P - 2009-09-21 10:25:09, source=flush, os.arch=amd64,
java.version=1.6.0_16, java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.}
docStoreOffset=0
docStoreSegment=_0
docStoreIsCompoundFile=false
no deletions
test: open reader.........OK
test: fields..............OK [33 fields]
test: field norms.........OK [33 fields]
test: terms, freq, prox...OK [7704753 terms; 180326717 terms/docs pairs;
340244234 tokens]
test: stored fields.......OK [1240755 total field count; avg 3 fields
per doc]
test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0 term/freq
vector fields per doc]
2 of 3: name=_1 docCount=359068
compound=false
hasProx=true
numFiles=8
size (MB)=1,125.161
diagnostics = {os.version=5.2, os=Windows 2003, lucene.version=2.9.0
817268P - 2009-09-21 10:25:09, source=flush, os.arch=amd64,
java.version=1.6.0_16, java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.}
docStoreOffset=413585
docStoreSegment=_0
docStoreIsCompoundFile=false
no deletions
test: open reader.........OK
test: fields..............OK [33 fields]
test: field norms.........OK [33 fields]
test: terms, freq, prox...WARNING: term literals:cfid196$ docFreq=43 !=
num docs seen 4 + num docs deleted 0
WARNING: term literals:cfid196$ docFreq=1 != num docs seen 4 + num docs
deleted 0
WARNING: term literals:cfid196$ docFreq=1 != num docs seen 4 + num docs
deleted 0
WARNING: term literals:cfid196$commandant docFreq=1 != num docs seen 9 +
num docs deleted 0
WARNING: term literals:cfid196$on docFreq=3178 != num docs seen 1 + num
docs deleted 0
OK [7137621 terms; 179101847 terms/docs pairs; 346076058 tokens]
test: stored fields.......OK [1077204 total field count; avg 3 fields
per doc]
test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0 term/freq
vector fields per doc]
3 of 3: name=_2 docCount=304849
compound=false
hasProx=true
numFiles=8
size (MB)=962.004
diagnostics = {os.version=5.2, os=Windows 2003, lucene.version=2.9.0
817268P - 2009-09-21 10:25:09, source=flush, os.arch=amd64,
java.version=1.6.0_16, java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.}
docStoreOffset=772653
docStoreSegment=_0
docStoreIsCompoundFile=false
no deletions
test: open reader.........OK
test: fields..............OK [33 fields]
test: field norms.........OK [33 fields]
test: terms, freq, prox...WARNING: term contents:? docFreq=1 != num
docs seen 246 + num docs deleted 0
WARNING: term literals:cfid196$ docFreq=45 != num docs seen 4 + num docs
deleted 0
WARNING: term literals:cfid196$ docFreq=1 != num docs seen 4 + num docs
deleted 0
WARNING: term literals:cfid196$cashier docFreq=1 != num docs seen 37 + num
docs deleted 0
WARNING: term literals:cfid196$interrogation docFreq=181 != num docs seen 1
+ num docs deleted 0
WARNING: term literals:cfid196$leader docFreq=1 != num docs seen 353 + num
docs deleted 0
WARNING: term literals:cfid196$microsoft docFreq=3114 != num docs seen 1 +
num docs deleted 0
WARNING: term literals:cfid196$nt docFreq=200 != num docs seen 1 + num docs
deleted 0
OK [6497769 terms; 145296880 terms/docs pairs; 293458734 tokens]
test: stored fields.......OK [914547 total field count; avg 3 fields per
doc]
test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0 term/freq
vector fields per doc]
No problems were detected with this index.
Peter
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Peter Keegan <peterlkee...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The only change I made to the source code was the patch for
> PayloadNearQuery
> > (LUCENE-1986).
>
> That patch certainly shouldn't lead to this.
>
> > It's possible that our content contains U+FFFF. I will run in debugger
> and
> > see.
>
> OK may as well check just so we cover all possibilities.
>
> > The data is 'sensitive', so I may not be able to provide a bad segment,
> > unfortunately.
>
> OK, maybe we can modify your CheckIndex instead. Let's start with
> this, which prints a warning whenever the docFreq differs but
> otherwise continues (vs throwing RuntimeException). I'm curious how
> many terms show this, and whether the TermEnum keeps working after
> this term that has different docFreq:
>
> Index: src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
> ===================================================================
> --- src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java (revision 829889)
> +++ src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java (working copy)
> @@ -672,8 +672,8 @@
> }
>
> if (freq0 + delCount != docFreq) {
> - throw new RuntimeException("term " + term + " docFreq=" +
> - docFreq + " != num docs seen " +
> freq0 + " + num docs deleted " + delCount);
> + System.out.println("WARNING: term " + term + " docFreq=" +
> + docFreq + " != num docs seen " + freq0 +
> " + num docs deleted " + delCount);
> }
> }
>
> Mike
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
