A handful of the source documents did contain the U+FFFF character. The patch from *LUCENE-2016 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2016> *fixed the problem. Thanks Mike!
Peter On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Hmm, only a few affected terms, and all this particular > "literals:cfid196$" term, with optional suffixes. Really strange. > > One things that's odd is the exact term "literals:cfid196$" is printed > twice, which should never happen (every unique term should be stored > only once, in the terms dict). > > And, otherwise, CheckIndex got through the index just fine. > > Try searching a TermQuery with these affected terms and see if it > succeeds? If so, maybe trying making an index with one or two of > them, alone, and see if that index shows the problem? > > OK I'm attaching more mods. Can you re-run your CheckIndex? It will > produce an enormous amount of output, but if you can excise the few > lines around when that warning comes out & post back that'd be great. > > Mike > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Peter Keegan <peterlkee...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Just to be safe, I ran with the official jar file from one of the mirrors > > and reproduced the problem. > > The debug session is not showing any characters = '\uffff' (checking this > in > > Tokenizer). > > The output from the modified CheckIndex follows. There are only a few > terms > > with the inconsistency. They are all legitimate terms from the app's > > context. With this info, I might be able to isolate the source documents. > > What should I be looking for when they are indexed? > > > > CheckInput output: > > > > Opening index @ D:\mnsavs\lresumes1\lresumes1.luc\lresumes1.search.main.4 > > > > Segments file=segments_2 numSegments=3 version=FORMAT_DIAGNOSTICS [Lucene > > 2.9] > > 1 of 3: name=_0 docCount=413585 > > compound=false > > hasProx=true > > numFiles=8 > > size (MB)=1,148.817 > > diagnostics = {os.version=5.2, os=Windows 2003, lucene.version=2.9.0 > > 817268P - 2009-09-21 10:25:09, source=flush, os.arch=amd64, > > java.version=1.6.0_16, java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.} > > docStoreOffset=0 > > docStoreSegment=_0 > > docStoreIsCompoundFile=false > > no deletions > > test: open reader.........OK > > test: fields..............OK [33 fields] > > test: field norms.........OK [33 fields] > > test: terms, freq, prox...OK [7704753 terms; 180326717 terms/docs > pairs; > > 340244234 tokens] > > test: stored fields.......OK [1240755 total field count; avg 3 fields > > per doc] > > test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0 term/freq > > vector fields per doc] > > > > 2 of 3: name=_1 docCount=359068 > > compound=false > > hasProx=true > > numFiles=8 > > size (MB)=1,125.161 > > diagnostics = {os.version=5.2, os=Windows 2003, lucene.version=2.9.0 > > 817268P - 2009-09-21 10:25:09, source=flush, os.arch=amd64, > > java.version=1.6.0_16, java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.} > > docStoreOffset=413585 > > docStoreSegment=_0 > > docStoreIsCompoundFile=false > > no deletions > > test: open reader.........OK > > test: fields..............OK [33 fields] > > test: field norms.........OK [33 fields] > > test: terms, freq, prox...WARNING: term literals:cfid196$ docFreq=43 > != > > num docs seen 4 + num docs deleted 0 > > WARNING: term literals:cfid196$ docFreq=1 != num docs seen 4 + num docs > > deleted 0 > > WARNING: term literals:cfid196$ docFreq=1 != num docs seen 4 + num docs > > deleted 0 > > WARNING: term literals:cfid196$commandant docFreq=1 != num docs seen 9 + > > num docs deleted 0 > > WARNING: term literals:cfid196$on docFreq=3178 != num docs seen 1 + num > > docs deleted 0 > > OK [7137621 terms; 179101847 terms/docs pairs; 346076058 tokens] > > test: stored fields.......OK [1077204 total field count; avg 3 fields > > per doc] > > test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0 term/freq > > vector fields per doc] > > > > 3 of 3: name=_2 docCount=304849 > > compound=false > > hasProx=true > > numFiles=8 > > size (MB)=962.004 > > diagnostics = {os.version=5.2, os=Windows 2003, lucene.version=2.9.0 > > 817268P - 2009-09-21 10:25:09, source=flush, os.arch=amd64, > > java.version=1.6.0_16, java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc.} > > docStoreOffset=772653 > > docStoreSegment=_0 > > docStoreIsCompoundFile=false > > no deletions > > test: open reader.........OK > > test: fields..............OK [33 fields] > > test: field norms.........OK [33 fields] > > test: terms, freq, prox...WARNING: term contents:? docFreq=1 != num > > docs seen 246 + num docs deleted 0 > > WARNING: term literals:cfid196$ docFreq=45 != num docs seen 4 + num docs > > deleted 0 > > WARNING: term literals:cfid196$ docFreq=1 != num docs seen 4 + num docs > > deleted 0 > > WARNING: term literals:cfid196$cashier docFreq=1 != num docs seen 37 + > num > > docs deleted 0 > > WARNING: term literals:cfid196$interrogation docFreq=181 != num docs > seen 1 > > + num docs deleted 0 > > WARNING: term literals:cfid196$leader docFreq=1 != num docs seen 353 + > num > > docs deleted 0 > > WARNING: term literals:cfid196$microsoft docFreq=3114 != num docs seen 1 > + > > num docs deleted 0 > > WARNING: term literals:cfid196$nt docFreq=200 != num docs seen 1 + num > docs > > deleted 0 > > OK [6497769 terms; 145296880 terms/docs pairs; 293458734 tokens] > > test: stored fields.......OK [914547 total field count; avg 3 fields > per > > doc] > > test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0 term/freq > > vector fields per doc] > > > > No problems were detected with this index. > > > > Peter > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Michael McCandless < > > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Peter Keegan <peterlkee...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > The only change I made to the source code was the patch for > >> PayloadNearQuery > >> > (LUCENE-1986). > >> > >> That patch certainly shouldn't lead to this. > >> > >> > It's possible that our content contains U+FFFF. I will run in debugger > >> and > >> > see. > >> > >> OK may as well check just so we cover all possibilities. > >> > >> > The data is 'sensitive', so I may not be able to provide a bad > segment, > >> > unfortunately. > >> > >> OK, maybe we can modify your CheckIndex instead. Let's start with > >> this, which prints a warning whenever the docFreq differs but > >> otherwise continues (vs throwing RuntimeException). I'm curious how > >> many terms show this, and whether the TermEnum keeps working after > >> this term that has different docFreq: > >> > >> Index: src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java > >> =================================================================== > >> --- src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java (revision > 829889) > >> +++ src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java (working copy) > >> @@ -672,8 +672,8 @@ > >> } > >> > >> if (freq0 + delCount != docFreq) { > >> - throw new RuntimeException("term " + term + " docFreq=" + > >> - docFreq + " != num docs seen " + > >> freq0 + " + num docs deleted " + delCount); > >> + System.out.println("WARNING: term " + term + " docFreq=" + > >> + docFreq + " != num docs seen " + freq0 + > >> " + num docs deleted " + delCount); > >> } > >> } > >> > >> Mike > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >> > > >