Hmmm, are they unit tests? Or would you be wiling to create stand-alone unit tests demonstrating this and submit it as a patch?
Best er...@alwaystrollingforworkfromothers.opportunistic. On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Christopher Tignor <ctig...@thinkmap.com>wrote: > my own tests with my own data show you are correct and the 1-n slop works > for matching terms at the same ordinal position. > > thanks! > > C>T> > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Paul Elschot <paul.elsc...@xs4all.nl > >wrote: > > > Op woensdag 25 november 2009 21:20:33 schreef Christopher Tignor: > > > It's worth noting however that this -1 slop doesn't seem to work for > > cases > > > where oyu want to discover instances of more than two terms at the same > > > position. Would be nice to be able to explicitly set this in the query > > > construction. > > > > I think requiring n terms at the same position would need a slop of 1-n, > > and I'd like to have some test cases added for that. > > Now if I only had some time... > > > > Regards, > > Paul Elschot > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > C>T> > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Christopher Tignor < > > ctig...@thinkmap.com>wrote: > > > > > > > yes that indeed works for me. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > C>T> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Paul Elschot < > paul.elsc...@xs4all.nl > > >wrote: > > > > > > > >> Op maandag 23 november 2009 20:07:58 schreef Christopher Tignor: > > > >> > Also, I noticed that with the above edit to NearSpansOrdered I am > > > >> getting > > > >> > erroneous results fo normal ordered searches using searches like: > > > >> > > > > >> > "_n" followed by "work" > > > >> > > > > >> > where because "_n" and "work" are at the same position the code > > changes > > > >> > accept their pairing as a valid in-order result now that the eqaul > > to > > > >> clause > > > >> > has been added to the inequality. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks for trying this. Indeed the "followed by" semantics is broken > > for > > > >> the ordered case when spans at the same positions are considered > > > >> ordered. > > > >> > > > >> Did I understand correctly that the unordered case with a slop of -1 > > > >> and without the edit works to match terms at the same position? > > > >> In that case it may be worthwhile to add that to the javadocs, > > > >> and also add a few testcases. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> Paul Elschot > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > C>T> > > > >> > > > > >> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Christopher Tignor > > > >> > <ctig...@thinkmap.com>wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks so much for this. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Using an un-ordered query, the -1 slop indeed returns the > correct > > > >> results, > > > >> > > matching tokens at the same position. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > I tried the same query but ordered both after and before > > rebuilding > > > >> the > > > >> > > source with Paul's changes to NearSpansOrdered but the query was > > still > > > >> > > failing, returning no results. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > C>T> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Mark Miller < > > markrmil...@gmail.com > > > >> >wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> Your trying -1 with ordered right? Try it with non ordered. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> Christopher Tignor wrote: > > > >> > >> > A slop of -1 doesn't work either. I get no results returned. > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > this would be a *really* helpful feature for me if someone > > might > > > >> suggest > > > >> > >> an > > > >> > >> > implementation as I would really like to be able to do > > arbitrary > > > >> span > > > >> > >> > searches where tokens may be at the same position and also in > > other > > > >> > >> > positions where the ordering of subsequent terms may be > > restricted > > > >> as > > > >> > >> per > > > >> > >> > the normal span API. > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > thanks, > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > C>T> > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Paul Elschot < > > > >> paul.elsc...@xs4all.nl > > > >> > >> >wrote: > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> >> Op zondag 22 november 2009 04:47:50 schreef Adriano > Crestani: > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >>> Hi, > > > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >>> I didn't test, but you might want to try SpanNearQuery and > > set > > > >> slop to > > > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >> zero. > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >>> Give it a try and let me know if it worked. > > > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >> The slop is the number of positions "in between", so zero > > would > > > >> still > > > >> > >> be > > > >> > >> >> too > > > >> > >> >> much to only match at the same position. > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> SpanNearQuery may or may not work for a slop of -1, but one > > could > > > >> try > > > >> > >> >> that for both the ordered and unordered cases. > > > >> > >> >> One way to do that is to start from the existing test cases. > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> Regards, > > > >> > >> >> Paul Elschot > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >>> Regards, > > > >> > >> >>> Adriano Crestani > > > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Christopher Tignor < > > > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >> ctig...@thinkmap.com>wrote: > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >>>> Hello, > > > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> > >> >>>> I would like to search for all documents that contain both > > > >> "plan" and > > > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> > >> >> "_v" > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >>>> (my part of speech token for verb) at the same position. > > > >> > >> >>>> I have tokenized the documents accordingly so these tokens > > > >> exists at > > > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> > >> >> the > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >>>> same location. > > > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> > >> >>>> I can achieve programaticaly using PhraseQueries by adding > > the > > > >> Terms > > > >> > >> >>>> explicitly at the same position but I need to be able to > > recover > > > >> the > > > >> > >> >>>> Payload > > > >> > >> >>>> data for each > > > >> > >> >>>> term found within the matched instance of my query. > > > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> > >> >>>> Unfortunately the PayloadSpanUtil doesn't seem to return > the > > > >> same > > > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> > >> >> results > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >>>> as > > > >> > >> >>>> the PhraseQuery, possibly becuase it is converting it > inoto > > > >> Spans > > > >> > >> first > > > >> > >> >>>> which do not support searching for Terms at the same > > document > > > >> > >> position? > > > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> > >> >>>> Any help appreciated. > > > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> > >> >>>> thanks, > > > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> > >> >>>> C>T> > > > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> > >> >>>> -- > > > >> > >> >>>> TH!NKMAP > > > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> > >> >>>> Christopher Tignor | Senior Software Architect > > > >> > >> >>>> 155 Spring Street NY, NY 10012 > > > >> > >> >>>> p.212-285-8600 x385 f.212-285-8999 > > > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > >> > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > > java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > > java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -- > > > >> > > TH!NKMAP > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Christopher Tignor | Senior Software Architect > > > >> > > 155 Spring Street NY, NY 10012 > > > >> > > p.212-285-8600 x385 f.212-285-8999 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > TH!NKMAP > > > >> > > > > >> > Christopher Tignor | Senior Software Architect > > > >> > 155 Spring Street NY, NY 10012 > > > >> > p.212-285-8600 x385 f.212-285-8999 > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > TH!NKMAP > > > > > > > > Christopher Tignor | Senior Software Architect > > > > 155 Spring Street NY, NY 10012 > > > > p.212-285-8600 x385 f.212-285-8999 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > TH!NKMAP > > > > > > Christopher Tignor | Senior Software Architect > > > 155 Spring Street NY, NY 10012 > > > p.212-285-8600 x385 f.212-285-8999 > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > TH!NKMAP > > Christopher Tignor | Senior Software Architect > 155 Spring Street NY, NY 10012 > p.212-285-8600 x385 f.212-285-8999 >
