Koji- I'm not familiar with the benchmarking system, but maybe I'll see
if I can run that benchmark on my test data as a point of comparison -
thanks for the pointer!
-Mike
On 6/20/2011 8:21 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
Mike,
FVH used to be faster for large docs. I wrote FVH section for Lucene
in Action and it said:
In contrib/benchmark (covered in appendix C), there’s an algorithm
file called highlight-vs-vector-highlight.alg that lets you see the
difference
between two highlighters in processing time. As of version 2.9, with
modern hardware,
that algorithm shows that FastVectorHighlighter is about two and a
half times faster
than Highlighter.
The number was for Lucene 2.9 age and Wikipedia data, maybe different
today.
Anyway, thank you for sharing interesting result!
koji
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
