Hi Erik, could you explain why PhraseQuery performs better than SpanNearQuery?
Some time has passed since I read about it, however I think it was exactly the other way round. Thanks! Em Am 21.09.2011 15:56, schrieb Erik Hatcher: > PhraseQuery suffices for the stated requirement of boosting when query terms > are closer. A common technique is to incorporate a PhraseQuery with a large > slop factor of the query terms into the query automatically, which implicitly > boosts matching documents when the query terms are closer. A SpanNearQuery > would work too, but a PhraseQuery might be easier to incorporate and will be > faster performing. > > Erik > > On Sep 21, 2011, at 05:31 , Akos Tajti wrote: > >> Thanks, I will check SpanNearQuery! >> >> Regards, >> Ákos >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Em <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Àkos, >>> >>> have a look at SpanNearQuery. This is what you want. >>> If you own the 2nd Edition of Lucene in Action have a look at their >>> examples. It illustrates how to combine them with the classical queries. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Em >>> >>> Am 21.09.2011 13:46, schrieb Akos Tajti: >>>> Dear List, >>>> >>>> for multi term expressions I'd like to add higher rank if the matches are >>>> closer to each other. For example for the search term "like eating" the >>>> string "i like eating" comes before "I like some eating". >>>> >>>> Is this possible? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance, >>>> >>>> Ákos Tajti >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
