In that case, it should be fine. Otherwise you would need to reindex. ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 8:42 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Migrate/Upgrade frommLucene 2.3 > > If you use StandardAnalyzer, you are in trouble unless you use > StandardAnalyzer with Version.LUCENE_23 and you are using non-western > language. If you change your code to use Version.LUCENE_41, you have to > reindex. > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ramprakash Ramamoorthy [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 8:38 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Migrate/Upgrade frommLucene 2.3 > > > > Dear all, > > > > We are moving our codebase from Lucene 2.3 to 4.1. Also, we > > are migrating the older indices from 2.3 to 3.6 and then to 4.1. Would > > be glad if you can share some do's and dont's during migrating the > > indices, which you have experienced before. > > > > Also, the 2.3 indices were written using a standard analyzer > > then and the current indices will use standard analyzer, version_41. > > Hope there shouldn't be a problem reading the migrated indices because > > of the analyzer version change? Thanks in advance. Glad if you can help. > > > > -- > > With Thanks and Regards, > > Ramprakash Ramamoorthy, > > India. > > +91 9626975420 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
