On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Ross Woolf <r...@rosswoolf.com> wrote: > Okay, just for clarity sake, what you are saying is that if I make the > FieldCache call it won't actually create and impose the loading time of the > FieldCache, but rather just use the NumericDocValuesField instead. Is this > correct?
Yes, exactly. its a little confusing, but a tradeoff to make docvalues work transparently with lots of existing code built off of fieldcache (sorting/grouping/joins/faceting/...) without having to have 2 separate implementations of what is the same thing. so its like "docvalues is a fieldcache you already built at index-time". > > Also, my similarity was extending SimilarityBase, and I can't see how to > get a docId as it is not passed in the score method "score(BasicStats > stats, float freq, float docLen)". Will I need to extend using Similarity > instead of SimilarityBase, or is there a way to get the docId using > SimilarityBase? Maybe we should just add a 'int doc' parameter to the SimilarityBase.score() method? Do you want to open a JIRA issue for this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
