Yes, I will open an issue.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Ross Woolf <r...@rosswoolf.com> wrote: > > Okay, just for clarity sake, what you are saying is that if I make the > > FieldCache call it won't actually create and impose the loading time of > the > > FieldCache, but rather just use the NumericDocValuesField instead. Is > this > > correct? > > Yes, exactly. its a little confusing, but a tradeoff to make docvalues > work transparently with lots of existing code built off of fieldcache > (sorting/grouping/joins/faceting/...) without having to have 2 > separate implementations of what is the same thing. so its like > "docvalues is a fieldcache you already built at index-time". > > > > > Also, my similarity was extending SimilarityBase, and I can't see how to > > get a docId as it is not passed in the score method "score(BasicStats > > stats, float freq, float docLen)". Will I need to extend using > Similarity > > instead of SimilarityBase, or is there a way to get the docId using > > SimilarityBase? > > Maybe we should just add a 'int doc' parameter to the > SimilarityBase.score() method? Do you want to open a JIRA issue for > this? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
