Thanks Mike. Yeah, I guess it wouldn't work for us in that case. Marcos
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marcos Juarez Lopez <mjua...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks for your quick response Mike. I'll be sure to pay more attention > to > > amount vs quantity in the future :) > > Sorry for being pedantic! I've been reading the book "Bugs in > Writing" recently :) > > > Just one clarification. I didn't mention we actually are using phrase > and > > proximity queries, which I believe use the position information. If > that's > > the case, is there a way to specify DOCS_AND_POSITIONS as an IndexOption? > > Based on the enum in FieldInfo, it seems you have to include frequencies > > if you want positional information. Does positional information require > > frequencies somehow, or is it just an option that's not supported > currently? > > Ahh, OK. > > Unfortunately, we must index freq information when we index positions: > that freq value (per document) tells us how many positions we should > read for that document. > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
