Is this true as well for 2.9.2? -----Original Message----- From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 8:54 AM To: Lucene Users Subject: Re: best choice for ramBufferSizeMB
Generally larger is better, as long as JVM's heap is big enough to allow IW to use that RAM. Large flushed segments means less merging later ... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Gudrun Siedersleben <siedersle...@mpdl.mpg.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > we want to speed up building our lucene index. We set ramBufferSize to some > values between 32 and 128 MB, but that does not make any difference > concerning the time used for reindexing. We did not set maxBufferedDocs, .. > which could conflict. > We start the JVM with the following JAVA_OPTS: > > -Xms128m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m > > What is the recommended value for ramBufferSizeMB depending on JAVA_OPTS and > perhaps other lucene parameters set? We use Lucene 3.6.0. > > Best regards > > Gudrun > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
