As indicated in my post, we use Lucene 4.2.1. On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you use Lucene or Solr? Lucene also has a replication module, which will > allow you to replicate index changes. > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Vijay B <vijay.nip...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We index docs coming from database nightly. Current index is sitting on > > NFS. Due to obvious performance reasons, we are switching are planning to > > switch to local index. W have cluster of 4 servers and with NFS it was > not > > a problem for us until now to share the index. but going forward, we are > > looking for our design options for index replication on to local storage. > > > > Our setup: > > Index size: 8GB (grows by 2GB every year) > > Lucene: 4.2.1 > > 64-bit Java > > > > The options we considered: > > * Each server instance,hosting a nightly job to pull delta of data from > > db. But, this would result in high DB load. (4 severs =4 times the load) > > > > * An additional nightly job sitting on another sever, that pushes the > data > > on to local disks of each instances..This may not work out as the local > > disk may not be visible. > > > > * each sever hosting a replication job that pulls delta of data from NFS > > and stores in the local index...so far this is the only promising option > we > > have. > > > > * Does solr an option for us in this case? (I know it's a question for > solr > > group..but experts here might have some thoughts..).. > > > > Thank you for your attention. > > >
