Looks very promising. I will check out your blog. On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ooops, didn't notice that :). > > So you'll need to upgrade to Lucene 4.4.0 in order to use it. You can read > some details as well as example code here: > http://shaierera.blogspot.com/2013/05/the-replicator.html. > > Shai > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Vijay B <vijay.nip...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > As indicated in my post, we use Lucene 4.2.1. > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Do you use Lucene or Solr? Lucene also has a replication module, which > > will > > > allow you to replicate index changes. > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Vijay B <vijay.nip...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > We index docs coming from database nightly. Current index is sitting > on > > > > NFS. Due to obvious performance reasons, we are switching are > planning > > to > > > > switch to local index. W have cluster of 4 servers and with NFS it > was > > > not > > > > a problem for us until now to share the index. but going forward, we > > are > > > > looking for our design options for index replication on to local > > storage. > > > > > > > > Our setup: > > > > Index size: 8GB (grows by 2GB every year) > > > > Lucene: 4.2.1 > > > > 64-bit Java > > > > > > > > The options we considered: > > > > * Each server instance,hosting a nightly job to pull delta of data > > from > > > > db. But, this would result in high DB load. (4 severs =4 times the > > load) > > > > > > > > * An additional nightly job sitting on another sever, that pushes > the > > > data > > > > on to local disks of each instances..This may not work out as the > local > > > > disk may not be visible. > > > > > > > > * each sever hosting a replication job that pulls delta of data from > > NFS > > > > and stores in the local index...so far this is the only promising > > option > > > we > > > > have. > > > > > > > > * Does solr an option for us in this case? (I know it's a question > for > > > solr > > > > group..but experts here might have some thoughts..).. > > > > > > > > Thank you for your attention. > > > > > > > > > >
