Robert, Let me lay out the scenario.
Hardware has .5T of Index is relatively small. Application profiling shows a significant amount of time spent codec-ing. Options as I see them: 1. Use DPF complete with the irritation of having to have this spurious codec name in the on-disk format that has nothing to do with the on-disk format. 2. 'Officially' use the standard codec, and then use something like AOP to intercept and encapsulate it with the DPF or something else like it -- essentially, a do-it-myself alternative to convincing the community here that this is a use case worthy of support. 3. Find some way to move a significant amount of the data in question out of Lucene altogether into something else which fits nicely together with filling memory with a cache so that the amount of codeccing drops below the threshold of interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
