On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:41 PM, McKinley, James T <james.mckin...@cengage.com> wrote:
> We really don't have the option of moving to local disk without a significant > redesign of our systems. However, we do have the possibility of switching to > iSCSI instead of NFS without changing our hardware, do you happen to know > whether iSCSI would be a better protocol for use with Lucene? Thanks! I don't have any direct experience with iSCSI, but I think it's likely it would be "correct" since it's a lower level protocol than NFS, i.e. from the computer's standpoint it thinks it's talking to a local SCSI drive (maybe)? But performance wise I'm not sure if it'd be better or worse ... if it must cross the same network connection as your NFS connection it seems likely it'd also have performance issues? Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
